Comments on: Walmart Wouldn’t Take More Than One Coupon

By: Blake Glawson

Blake Glawson — Tue, 22 Jan 2013 00:23:31 +0000

This article ended up being surely an extremely excellent examine. I has been impressed from the contents with this publish. I cannot wait around to find out what else you’ve got available for individuals. I will be definitely getting excited about the next publish. Many thanks pertaining to sharing!

By: glowworm2k

glowworm2k — Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:08:44 +0000

I hadn’t realized that any stores would take multiple coupons for a product. I know that this is quite common in the states, but I thought that it was usually considered fraud here; maybe this is a Canada vs. USA policy thing??

By: linda

linda — Sun, 20 Mar 2011 00:31:14 +0000

write to Walmart.ca and complain

By: JudgeJudy

JudgeJudy — Sat, 19 Mar 2011 05:30:14 +0000

Their policy clearly says “One per purchase” means “One per transaction. CLEARLY. So does Zellers. So does Loblaws

By: Alex

Alex — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 21:32:01 +0000

Target typically undercuts Wal-Mart on prices
http://chicagobreakingbusiness.com/2011/03/target-typically-undercuts-wal-mart-on-prices.html

“Wal-Mart’s slogan may be “Save Money. Live Better,” but rival Target is challenging it by offering even lower prices on everyday products.

Two recent price comparisons of grocery and household goods revealed that Target’s prices are lower than at No. 1 retailer Wal-Mart”

By: Alicia

Alicia — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 19:45:30 +0000

This happened to me yesterday, as well. Of course, the cashier was really smug about too!

I don’t get what their problem is either - trust me, I work retail - The stores make money from these coupons so I don’t know why they have such a hard time accepting them!!

By: melsprag

melsprag — Fri, 18 Mar 2011 15:29:13 +0000

I don’t understand why Wal-Mart gives us a such a hard time. They can be nasty and treat us like criminals.The manufacturers refund them.I would call the head office and complain. Their policy stated you can use more than one.